Attention Unemployed

There is a spectre sitting on the face of the unemployed. It's like a giant, suffocating cat only less concerned whether or not you can breathe. It's what Wall Street, Congress, several successive presidential administrations and other entities have done to us these past few decades. Unemployed workers of the world, Unite! You have nothing to lose but hope and change.

Every once in a while, Mrs. JP will send me something that's both useful and informative. Lost to posterity are the countless blog posts her communiques have inspired and today is no different. This morning she sent me something from Unemployedworkers.org, one that invites us to send them our stories.

To a lot of the right wing morons reading this blog, especially those who feel entitled to smugness for no other reason than having a shitty job with little to nothing in the way of benefits and an actual future, save your comments. I stopped reading them long ago. While I hate asking for assistance, I will do anything within my powers to keep a roof over our heads. And unless you've been in approximately the same position I am currently in, having lost a job of several years through no fault of your own, tearing through your UI benefits and being roundly ignored and disrespected after applying for jobs you've already held down because some scumbags decided to move the goal posts back into the next area code, then I can't expect you to appreciate the devastation to my mindset, to my self-esteem.

However, I know that some of my regular readers are also unemployed and just clinging to life. Being possessed of some writing skills, my eloquence will always be there to help give you and others like you a voice.

What follows below is the exact same letter I just sent them. I don't pretend it's the most horrible story ever written but it still reads like something that's a cross between Stephen King and an inverted Horatio Alger. You may dismiss it as whining and may even ludicrously follow it up with "Get a job." That's the problem. That's exactly the problem and if there was no problem getting a job, then letters like this wouldn't have to be written and Unemployedworkers.org wouldn't need to exist.

---

After my last, right wing, boss nearly bled his company dry with neverending, longterm embezzlement, I, his soon-to-be ex wife and two others lost our jobs on April 27, 2009. This was exactly a month after my g/f of 15+ years kicked me out of the house and I locked myself into a one year lease with my new landlord. In the ensuing 2 1/2-3 years, I've registered with 8 temp agencies and have not gotten a single interview with them. I've been on less than two dozen job interviews that I've set up on my own and they'd, obviously, not resulted in a single job. What few production jobs that haven't been outsourced to China or Mexico or India have been almost completely co-opted by scumbag temp agencies (look on Craigslist, if you don't believe me) offering minimum wage positions and demanding unrealistic qualifications (background, drug and credit rating checks? Really???).

In late July of 2010, my fiancee who has nearly 20 years graphic design experience lost her job at a busy sign shop at which she'd been working for close to a year. Her bosses, also right wingers, cheerfully told her as they were laying her off that she could easily get by on UI. Since she was making minimum wage all that time and forbidden from working close to 40 hours a week, her average weekly gross check was $270, ergo $135 on UI. Her (likely) last extension will end in a few weeks. I exhausted my own benefits, out of which I was paying over $100 a week in child support, leaving me with $137 weekly, back in March of '11. Our rent is $650 a month. You do the math.

Never in my life have I gone for more than 14 months w/o work and usually I could find a new job within days or weeks. Sometime in the last 10 years, something awful happened to this country. Being a political blogger who covers this kind of stuff, I was following the trends and figures. But knowing the statistics and becoming one of those statistics are two entirely different things and there is definitely a widening Us vs Them gulf separating the gainfully employed from the unemployed. I have been roundly ignored and disrespected and I've driven as much as 50 miles round trip just to drop off a few sheets of paper after a Craigslist cattle call while being refused a interview.

To people in a position to give jobs, we're just surplus humanity, expendable intake and their contempt for the unemployed knows no bounds because a 9-10% unemployment rate allows their darker, nastier side to come out with impunity. Temp agencies no longer put people to work: They now send out resumes to picky and choosy clients who gauge your worth on a couple of sheets of virtual paper. Companies, overjoyed about the current state of fear and desperation, cheerfully add more and more responsibilities onto increasingly open-ended job descriptions. Then when I apply for jobs I've already held & at which I've succeeded, I get rejected and/or ignored for not knowing how to do 5% of the job.

If it wasn't for my blog readers kicking in once in a while with Paypal donations, my g/f and I would've been out on the street many months ago. As it is, it's a constant struggle to remain 1 step ahead of our creditors, keep food in the house and a roof over our heads. We are on SNAP and that won't last forever. I'd even sent out resumes accompanied by letters to employers telling them how desperate my situation was, that I lost my last job through no fault of my own. All but one was ignored and the one company that showed me some encouragement then turned on me the next day without explanation.

The current administration is one that employs GE CEO Jeff Immedlt, who has done more to offshore US jobs than almost every corporation, as jobs czar. In light of that and other troubling facts, I don't see Obama and especially Congress doing anything significant in the way of job creation. It isn't enough to create jobs that companies resist creating. We have to first get back the jobs that people like Immedlt had outsourced to Third World countries employing glorified slave labor for pennies on the dollar under the risible rubric of "remaining competitive." Two-three weeks ago, remembering that the President reads 10 letters a day from Americans, I'd written to the Obama administration about this and more and have not heard back from the WH, nor do I expect to.

My fiancee and I are just 2 stories out of 14,000,000 who are presently unable to find work. We have little cash on hand, no hope of celebrating Christmas in any traditional way, have no health or life insurance whatsoever. I am a QC inspector with ISO experience, have worked in factories all my life, have retail management and sales experience and am a talented novelist who once had an agent. Yet I cannot even get my foot in the door through a temp agency and literary agencies just as studiously and strenuously ignore me.

If I had more of a suicidal mindset than I already do, I would've done away with myself long, long ago. But as unrelievedly bleak as our life together is, as hopeless as our future looks, I have a g/f to look after. But I've been tap-dancing for almost three years now and my legs are getting mighty tired.

Robert Crawford

Counter-terrorism triumphs may not facilitate to Obama in 2012 vote

US President Barack Obama may have a rope of anti-terrorism victory and made higher position from the people on foreign policy, but neither is probably to assist him grip the White House.

For his management, this re-election truth is an annoying base line.

When the first-term senator succeeded the presidency, queries hanged back about his willingness to tackle national security issues. Yet Obama has got broader appreciation for operations that have died terrorist chiefs, most remarkably Osama bin Laden in May, and Anwar al-Awlaki on Friday.

Al-Awlaki, an American national struck in the U.S. drone attack, was believed by the management as having a "crucial operational task" in terrorist plans. They included two nearly destructive assaults on U.S.-bound planes, an airliner on Christmas 2009 and cargo planes last year.

Obama also can say benefit for attacking Libyan activists in step downing Moammar Gadhafi, for helping other democratic movements in the Arab world, for drawing down the battle in Iraq and Afghanistan and for discussing a new nuclear arms reducing treaty with Russia.

But except for unpredicted mishaps, the nation's inflexibly higher joblessness rate and chaos in the financial markets mean people are far more probably to vote next November with the economy principal in their minds, not the president's history on foreign strategy and terrorism.

That's dreadful news for the management because people give Obama far greater support ratings on terrorism than on his tackling of the economy.

Indeed Obama's endorsement rating on terrorism was advanced than on any other matter, according to an Associated Press-GFK poll held in late August. It appeared that 60% of those reviewed endorsement of his tackling of terrorism. Only 36% supported of his tackling of the economy, an all-time poor for Obama.

Obama's on the whole support rating also chop down to an all-time low in the poll, 46%.

The re-election image obtains even gloomier given that 92% of those inquired said the economy was an tremendously or very key issue. By assessment 73% put the same importance on terrorism, but even they're separated over whether Obama should be re-elected.

It's also not clear whether the murdering of al-Awlaki will bring Obama any fresh political favor. The blistering American-born priest had a hand in many prestigious terror efforts on the U.S., but his name is barely as well-known to most Americans as bin Laden.

Obama's classifies for U.S. special forces to execute bin Laden during an attack on his Pakistani compound did give the president's endorsement rating a hit. But it established briefing, additional facts of the less important role of terrorism for voters.

"It's not 2004," said Rick Nelson, a leading fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "This isn't the main issue facing the United States. The key issue is the economy and jobs. That matter is going to surpass anything we do overseas."

The joint CIA-U.S. military raid that aimed al-Awlaki and killed a second American citizen wasn't without disagreement.

The assault actually was the first time a U.S. citizen was tracked and accomplished based on secret intelligence and the president's say-so, elevating questions about the reach of presidents' authorities.

Texas Rep. Ron Paul, a GOP presidential nominee, called it a "murder" and said Americans should not carelessly acknowledge such aggression against U.S. nationals, even those with valid ties to terrorism.

But most other top Republicans contesting for Obama's job saw small disadvantage in admiring the president for his role.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry applauded president Obama, as well as the military and spy agencies, for "violent anti-terror policies." Ex- Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney criticized the president for his attempts to keep Americans secure and said al-Awlaki's killing was a "biggest victory" in the terrorism fight.

With the first nominating contests about three months away, foreign policy and terrorism have been virtually absent from the Republican race. When the issues have arisen, most GOP contenders have tried to portray the president as a weak leader. It's a sentiment they hope taps into voters' frustration with the economy.

Bruce Jones, an expert on transnational threats, said Obama's success against terrorist leaders may help counter that GOP strategy.

"At the very least, it takes away from the critics the idea that he can't lead, that he doesn't understand those kinds of issues," said Jones, also a senior foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think tank.

Away from the antiterrorism attempts, Obama advisers say they consider the president will acquire credit come Election Day for his foreign policy successes in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, in addition for his favor of other democratic movements in the whole the Arab world. They say the president has enhanced U.S. positioning in the world, making it easier to obtain international support for his strategies, sooner than having to go it alone.

But there is some worries amid Obama supporters that the one foreign policy matter most probably to locate a spot in the 2012 campaign is one that has got mild success: protecting peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

Republicans and some Jewish voters cover him as anti-Israel, while much of the world differs with his antagonism to Palestinian attempts to look for statehood acknowledgement at the United Nations.